Monday, May 25, 2020

US Womens Soccer - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 4 Words: 1311 Downloads: 2 Date added: 2019/04/04 Category Sports Essay Level High school Tags: Soccer Essay Did you like this example? Inequality for women in the United States is something that has long been investigated and argued controversially. Its one of those issues, like injustice for people of color, that we are making progress in but are still far from reaching true and fair balance. We often see this inequality in the workplace, where women are put into different work environments, with adjusted benefits and pay solely based on the gender factor. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "US Womens Soccer" essay for you Create order It is no different for professional athletes. Playing a sport professionally IS their job, and players still see the same unfair discrimination as seen in more corporate settings. US womens soccer has long been struggling in the fight to receive fair pay and equal benefits compared to the men, especially given that womens soccer sees more success in their games, and attract a greater audience. How is it that women still are forced to play of turf fields, while the men almost always get grass fields? The womens team plays the majority of their matches on turf, which has been shown to increase the risk of injuries and a force a more cautious style of play, while the men get the luxury most often playing on grass. Clearly, the success of the womens team means nothing to the Football Association when it comes to ensuring their safety. The US mens team still receives higher pay, even though US women often make it past group stages into the quarter, semi, and championship round, bringing home more victories and trophies. They are overlooked in even the simplest matters, such as hotel and family accomodations. The issue is that US womens soccer players are still being ill-treated when its clear they deserve more. They should be able to make a decent life for themselves with all the work they put in and the results they produce for our country. FIFA and the USSF need to provide the womens team with more equitable benefits when it comes to equipment and field quality, and better salaries and bonuses for the achievements of the team. Of course, the mens team should be entitled to their bonuses when they perform well too, its just a fact that they tend to not do as well as women in the World Cup, Olympics, and other tournaments. Based on their higher number of viewers and numerous wins and championships they bring home for our country, and, there is no reason the womens team should not be given fairer pay, the right to play in a safe environment, receive unbiased travel and living accommodations, and be seen as soccer players without a sexist bias. The greatest portion of funding for the United States Soccer Federation comes from their broadcasting and sponsorship revenue, with their main partner being ESPN. The US womens national team has established a growing audience which has certainly surpassed the viewership of the mens games. According to a network ratings report, In 2011, the womens world cup final ranked as the most-viewed soccer telecast (regardless of gender) ever on ESPN; the sixth-most viewed soccer telecast ever on a single network (also, regardless of gender); and the second-most viewed daytime program in the history of cable television. It drew a 7.4 U.S. rating and 13.458 million viewers (Wile). The womens team has broken records with ESPN as well as cable television in general. They are attracting a greater audience, and generating more budget money for the USSF. However, they are not getting the proper credit and fair rewards. The world cup isnt the only tournament these women have taken over in ratings. The team put on an intense semi-final battle with Canada in the 2012 London olympics, ending the nail-biting game with a 4-3 victory. Reports state, In 2012, the U.S.-Canada womens Olympic semifinal contributed the then- single most-viewed half-hour of the Olympics on NBCSN, breaking another record for broadcasters partnered with the USSF (Wile). The mens team fails to come close to the positive ratings and viewers the women have brought, and continue to be a weak source of income for the federation. The women continuously make themselves known, proving them worthy of getting compensation for their growing popularity. Men still make roughly 40% more than the women, regardless of how interested viewers are in their games, or what ratings they receive (Close). In addition, a budget report from the USSF shows the womens team is projected to bring in more than $17 million in revenues, including a $5 million surplus for fiscal year 2017, nearly doubling their male counterparts, who are expected to run a deficit (Santhanam). Bringing in more money than the men from sponsorships and viewers across multiple networks is a point worthy of consideration, but the USSF seems to overlook that, and refuses to give women the wages they so rightly deserve. The mens team, which is actually LOSING money for the federation is somehow getting payed better than the women who are constantly producing more money for the budget. In some ways, they are just giving money to the men, since thats where most of it goes. Given that the womens games are more popular than the mens through various statistics, it is only fair that they receive more of the money that they bring in for the federation. A big part of the viewership the women see from their games comes from the fact that they make it further in events like the FIFA world cup, the Olympics, friendly matches, and various tournaments than the men do. Both the men and womens team participate in the same number of friendly matches with other countries. Chaddha highlights how unimportant success is for these players, stating that The women would earn $99,000 each if they won 20 friendlies, the minimum number they are required to play in a year. But the men would likely earn $263,320 each for the same feat, and would get $100,000 even if they lost all 20 games (Chaddha). Players on the mens team will still get a higher salary no matter how successful they are in their games. Aside from friendly matches, The womens team has won three World Cups, with their most recent triumph occurring in 2015. The mens team has yet to advance past the quarterfinals of a World Cup, let alone win the whole tournament (Chaddha). These competitive women have a passion for soccer and love the game, but they are still ultimately playing to bring titles home for their country. Given their success in the world cup, one might believe that these women are getting paid a sufficient amount for their efforts to take home these trophies. However, Close points out that the men made 8 million dollars for getting 11th place in their world cup, while the women made one-fourth of that, 2 million, for hosting and placing in 1st for their world cup (Close). Its hard to find justification for a championship team getting less pay than a team that fails to even reach the quarter-finals. The olympic games is the only instance in which the men and women received equal pay. In this case, The Federation offered equal pay of $15,000 to each womens and mens national team member who qualified to play in the Olympics and another $15,000 to everyone who made the roster (Santhanam). While this is a step in the right direction, this is just a small pay increase the USSF granted to take some of the pressure off and temporarily satisfy the players. They stray away from larger issues involving the world cup and friendly matches these women partake in. They support their families and themselves with the salaries from matches that occur more often, and participation in said matches is not earning them the pay increase they want. The womens team has proven their strengths on the field, qualifying and making it far in esteemed tournaments and winning matches, from which they should be receiving more money for their hard work and dedication.

Thursday, May 14, 2020

Parole Linguistic Definition and Examples

In linguistics, the individual expressions of language in contrast to langue, language as an abstract system of signs. This distinction between langue and parole was first made by Swiss linguist Ferdinand de Saussure in his Course in General Linguistics (1916). Etymology From the French paraula, speech Observations Can there be a science of language, if so, do we have to stomp on it first to make it amenable? Do we have to murder to dissect, to quote Wordsworth? There are several things the would-be linguistic scientist can do. One is to slice up language in such a way as to have one part that lives and moves about in crazy ways, and another that stays in one place and thus can be dissected to reveal its inner nature. This is essentially what Saussure did, when he distinguished parole (the unruly side) from langue (the quiet side). Parole refers to the actual language use of individual people in their everyday lives, and is too erratic to be studied, according to Saussure. Langue is the shared social structure of language, and is richly structured as a system of systems. The latter is what can be investigated scientifically.  Ã¢â‚¬â€¹(Leo Van Lier, The Ecology and Semiotics of Language Learning: A Sociocultural Perspective. Birkhà ¤user, 2004)Langue/Parole--The reference here is to the disti nction made by the Swiss linguist Saussure. Where parole is the realm of the individual moments of language use, of particular utterances or messages, whether spoken or written, langue is the system or code (le code de la langue) which allows the realization of the individual messages.  (Stephen Heath, Translators Note in Image-Music-Text by Roland Barthes. Macmillan, 1988) The Analogy of a Chess Game The langue-parole dichotomy was introduced into linguistics by Ferdinand de Saussure (1916), who used the analogy of a chess game to illustrate what it entails. To engage in a game of chess both players must first know the langue of chess--the rules of movement and the overall strategy of how to play. Langue imposes constraints on, and provides a guide to, the choices each player can make in the act of playing the game. The actual choices characterize parole--the ability to apply the abstract knowledge of chess (langue) to a specific game-playing situation.  (Marcel Danesi, Second Language Teaching: A View From the Right Side of the Brain. Springer, 2003) Pronunciation: pa-ROLE

Wednesday, May 6, 2020

Sacred Scripture and Cosmogony of Islam and Christianity

The Sacred Scripture and Cosmogony of Islam and Christianity In every religion around the world, there are very important scriptures and beliefs on how the universe came into being. Christianity and Islam are no different than any other religion in those aspects. They have similar thoughts on things in the sacred scriptures they have, and they also have opposing views. Also, these two religions have different views on the creation of the universe, both of these topics will be discussed here. It is important to understand the views on the following topics by these two religions for a number of reasons. Christianity and Islam are the two largest religions in the world, with approximately 1.9 billion people being Christian and 1.1 billion†¦show more content†¦Much of the New Testament talks about the life of Jesus, and these books were written by Jesus disciples. The original texts that made up the Bible are gone or lost, and have been copied various times to preserve the teach ings. The Bible is broken down in ways like the Quran. First, it is broke into two Testaments, one is called the Old Testament, which was originally written in Hebrew. The Old Testament talks about the creation of the world to the laws a person should follow. The second half is called the New Testament, was written in Greek, and much of this talks about the life and teachings of Jesus Christ. It also has letters written by leaders of the early church (Geoghegan, 14), and also has the end of the time prophecies. In each of the Testaments there are books (think of the chapters of a novel), here are a total of 66 books in the Bible that we have today, in each book there are also verses like in the Quran. The contemporary expression of the Christian Bible is just as import as the Quran for a Muslim. There are a few slight differences though. Many people go to church to praise and worship God and a pastor gives a lecture about a subject in the Bible, Muslims would read a passage from th e Quran and then explain how it applies to their lives. A Christian could (and does) do this, but typically it isnt as rigid of a structure. However, there are many different branches of Christianity from Baptist to Catholic, and they each haveShow MoreRelatedReligion, Religion And Religion1418 Words   |  6 Pagesunderstand to be the fundamental power of life.† (Ring, Nash, MacDonald, and Glenmon, p 79). This explanation the book gives explains why it is so difficult to define religion. There are many types of religions across the world such as, Christianity, Judaism, Hinduism, Islam, Chinese and many more. Each of these religions are celebrated in different ways because of the different beliefs everyone has in their God. In the book religion is also explained as â€Å"belief in superhuman beings which means, in someRead MoreAll religious systems are based on certain beliefs. Some are extreme while others appear to be the1400 Words   |  6 Pagesdatable events that are s een as fundamental to the progress of history. Judaism, Christianity, and Islam all have historical eschatologies. Eschatology in the Hebrew Scriptures sees the tragedies that surrounded the people of Israel as due to their insubordination to the laws and willpower of God and embraces that conformity to Gods plan will result in rejuvenation and the accomplishment of Gods aim. In Christianity, the conclusion of times are said to have originated with the life and preaching

Tuesday, May 5, 2020

Alexander the Great Arriving in Persepolis Essay Example For Students

Alexander the Great Arriving in Persepolis Essay I am Alexander the Great, King of Macedonia ruler of Greece. I have been king of Macedonia since my fathers assassination five years ago. Since his death I have conquered much of the world. I am ruthless, and should anyone attempt to defeat me in battle, they are sure to die. The year I became ruler of Macedonia I set out to the city of Thessaly to restore Macedonia rule. After Thessaly submitted to me I conquered many states, and many other states freely submitted without battles. Two years after my fathers death, my war with the Persians began. Near the city of Troy, I defeated the Persian army. In doing so, all the states of Asia then submitted their arms to me. A year later I would encounter the Persians again; this time the main Persian army would be my opponent. I defeated the Persian army led by King Darious III at the city of Issus, and a year later took the city of Tyre. Furthermore, Egypt surrendered to me. Perhaps they knew they could not defeat me in battle and thought it better not to try. I had now secured control of the entire eastern Mediterranean coastline. I now bring you to my present time in history. It has been five years since I became king of Macedonia, and I have once again defeated my enemy, King Darious III at Babylon. I am now setting my sights on penetrating into the walls of Persepolis. I am very excited about this, as I am planning to retrieving many treasures which lie behind the walls. This will be a very fulfilling defeat because the Persian Empire plundered Athens almost 15 decades ago. I cannot let this go and because of it I will penetrate Persepolis and defeat the Persians and consummate vengeance upon them. With my highly skilled army of about sixty-thousand men, I entered Persepolis and assumed control of its palace. I find myself in the heart of Persia. From the Persian treasury at Persepolis I seized a wondrous amount of money. It is a well deserved payback, and I must resort to the tradition of vengeance for what the Persians did when Xerxes invaded Greece some hundred and fifty years ago. Alexander turned the city over to his troops, who stormed through its streets, slaughtered men, plundered their property and stripped women of their jewellery. My army and I will stay in Persepolis for the remainder of the winter and rest. There are many battles ahead for which we will need strength. It was with this that I started to think that I could not be both the avenger for what the Persians had done in Greece and at the same time be their new ruler. But in early spring I also knew that I owed it to the Athenians to allow vengeance one last time. Xerxes burned the Athenian Acropolis and the towns and temples of Attica those 15 decades ago, and I know that I must do something equally destructive. After a four month stay in Persepolis, it is now time to move on to conquer more states and force them to be ruled by Greeks. The night before we were to leave Persepolis, my men and I engaged in drinking and feasting. As the night went on, and my anger inside me grew, I began thinking of a way to attain vengeance against the Persians. I figured the only way to truly achieve this was to do to them what they had done to the Athenians. It was with this that my army and I burned Persepolis palace of Xerxes. I have now gotten my revenge on the Persians and I can now become their ruler and put the vengeance behind me. .